Printed for the Publicfoundedandforward.comFor Teens & Adults of Every Background

Your Questions

Why Is Socialism Becoming Popular?

Published October 20, 2026 · Last checked October 20, 2026

The question, stated fairly

"A lot of people my age say they like socialism. Older relatives say that's crazy. But we're not crazy. We're worried. Rent eats our paychecks, a house feels out of reach, and many of us carry student loans. Is wanting something different really so wrong?"

That is a sincere question, and it deserves a sincere answer. Most people drawn to socialism aren't asking for a dictatorship. They're asking for security and a fair shot. Those are good things to want. So let's start by taking the concerns seriously, then look at what history and the data say about the best way to meet them.

The concerns are real

Here is what official data shows about the pressures many Americans, especially younger ones, feel. (All figures are from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis's FRED database, which republishes government data. Dates are listed.)

  • Rent has outpaced prices in general. The government's index for rent of a primary residence rose about 2.5 times between January 2000 and September 2026. The overall consumer price index rose about 2.0 times over the same period. (BLS, CPI-U, not seasonally adjusted.)
  • Homes cost more compared with income. The median sales price of houses sold averaged about 3.6 times median household income in 1985. In 2025 it was about 4.75 times. (Census/HUD sales prices; Census household income. Our calculation from FRED data.)
  • Borrowing to buy is expensive. The average 30-year mortgage rate was 7.40% on October 15, 2026, compared with 2.65% in early January 2021. (Freddie Mac, via FRED.)
  • Student debt grew a lot. Student loans owned and securitized rose from about $589 billion in late 2007 to about $1.78 trillion in late 2024. (Federal Reserve G.19 data via FRED; the series has since been discontinued.)
  • Young workers face higher unemployment. In September 2026, the unemployment rate for ages 20 to 24 was 8.0%, compared with 4.2% for all workers. (BLS, via FRED.)

If you feel squeezed, these numbers say you're not imagining it. (For more detail, see our article Why Is Housing So Expensive?)

Why socialism sounds like the answer

When costs feel out of control, it makes sense to look for someone to make things fair. Socialism promises that: share the wealth, guarantee the basics, and take power away from big companies. For people who've never lived under it, the word often means something like "free healthcare and cheaper college," not "the government owns the factories."

Part of the confusion is that people mean very different things by "socialism." Some mean a larger safety net inside a market economy. Others mean what the word historically described: public or collective ownership of the means of production. The Communist Manifesto of 1848 put its core idea bluntly:

"the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."

Many modern supporters of socialism do not want that. It's worth asking anyone who uses the word, including yourself, "Which version do you mean?"

What history suggests

Here's where we respectfully make our case.

Systems that tried to abolish private property and run the economy from the center have a hard record. One useful comparison is countries that started in similar places but chose different systems. The Maddison Project Database, a long-running academic dataset of historical incomes, estimates GDP per person (adjusted for inflation and price differences):

Country 1990 2022
South Korea (market economy) $13,874 $41,321
North Korea (state-run economy) $2,456 $1,569
Poland (left central planning after 1989) $8,150 $32,468
Venezuela (expanded state control of the economy in the 2000s) $13,251 $5,267

Economists debate how much of each result comes from the economic system itself, versus war, sanctions, oil prices, or political repression. But the overall pattern is hard to ignore.

Meanwhile, Adam Smith described in 1776 why free exchange works even when people aren't saints:

"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest."

In a free market, the way to get ahead is to make something other people want. That pressure, repeated millions of times a day, is what tends to bring prices down and quality up.

So why are housing and college so expensive?

Here's the hopeful part. Many of the costs that frustrate people most are in areas where markets are least free. Housing is heavily shaped by local zoning and permitting rules, and college is heavily shaped by government loans and subsidies. Economists disagree about how much each factor matters. Still, a reasonable case can be made that the fix is more freedom to build, compete and choose, not less.

Where people disagree

Fair-minded people disagree here. Some economists argue that a stronger safety net (like those in some European countries) can coexist with a free-market economy. Others argue that high taxes and heavy regulation slow growth and opportunity. Those are honest debates, and you can have them without calling anyone names.

A shared goal

People drawn to socialism and people who believe in free markets often want the same things: a home, a good job, a family, and a fair shot. The Declaration of Independence names "the pursuit of Happiness" as a right. The question is which system gives the most people the best chance to pursue it. We think the 250-year American record makes a strong case for freedom. Look at the evidence, and decide for yourself.

Sources (all accessed Oct 20, 2026)

See something wrong? Suggest a correction.